AI-Empowered SAFe Advanced Scrum Master ASM Exam Questions
Page content
Comprehensive list of AI-Empowered SAFe Advanced Scrum Master (ASM) Exam Questions curated for cracking the exam in first attempt.
Certification update (2026): Scaled Agile now offers this certification as the AI-Empowered SAFe Advanced Scrum Master, recommended for experienced Scrum Masters who already hold the SAFe Scrum Master (SSM) certification. The exam is 60 questions, multiple-choice single-select, 120 minutes, 82% passing score, web-based and closed book. A legacy, shorter “ASM” exam version (20 questions / 60 minutes / 80% passing, covering only 3 domains) also still appears in Scaled Agile’s catalog for candidates on the older learning path — check your Learning Plan to confirm which version you’ve been assigned before you start studying.
Disclaimer: Scaled Agile Inc is a protected Brand. These exam questions are neither endorsed by nor affiliated with Scaled Agile. These are not the SAFe official exam questions/dumps. These questions are created from the public web content of the Scaled Agile Framework, the official ASM exam study guide, and other publicly available Scaled Agile articles. These questions cover all the domains and topics of the official exam and once you go through these questions and their concepts, you are more than ready to crack the exam in first attempt.
Overview
- Prepare well for the exam. Understand all SAFe Team and ART flow, coaching, and conflict-resolution concepts covered below.
- Requires 1 to 2 weeks of preparation if you already hold SSM and have hands-on Scrum Master experience.
- You need to solve 60 questions (multiple-choice, single-select) in 120 mins from your laptop without any supervision. It is an open-resource but closed-book, unproctored online exam — no outside assistance is allowed per the Candidate Agreement.
- Passing score is 82%, i.e. you need to get at least 50 out of 60 correct.
- Recommended prerequisite: SAFe Scrum Master (SSM) certification and real-world experience facilitating a Scrum team.
Exam Domains
The exam questions below are grouped and weighted to match the official exam blueprint:
| # | Domain | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evolving the Advanced Scrum Master Role | 11-13% |
| 2 | Improving Flow | 22-24% |
| 3 | Building High-Performing Teams | 26-28% |
| 4 | Addressing Conflict | 18-20% |
| 5 | Improving ART Performance | 17-19% |
Please leave your feedback in the comment section or contact us from main menu.
Wish you all the best for the AI-Empowered SAFe Advanced Scrum Master (ASM) Exam!
60 Practice Questions
Domain 1: Evolving the Advanced Scrum Master Role
What is the primary difference in scope between a SAFe Scrum Master (SSM) and an Advanced Scrum Master (ASM)?
⬜ The ASM writes code alongside the development team
✅ The ASM extends servant leadership and coaching beyond a single team to the ART and cross-team level
⬜ The ASM replaces the Product Owner during PI Planning
⬜ The ASM only facilitates the Daily Stand-up
Explanation:-
An ASM builds on core Scrum Master skills and applies them at a broader scale — coaching other Scrum Masters, resolving cross-team flow and conflict issues, and helping improve ART-level performance, not just team-level events.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
An Advanced Scrum Master notices a team consistently looks to them to make every decision. What leadership behavior should the ASM adopt to correct this?
⬜ Make the decisions faster so the team isn’t blocked
✅ Shift from a directive style to coaching and asking powerful questions so the team builds its own decision-making capability
⬜ Escalate every team decision to the Release Train Engineer
⬜ Assign a technical lead to make decisions instead
Explanation:-
Servant leadership favors growing the team’s self-management capability over the Scrum Master remaining the single point of decision-making.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Which best describes how an Advanced Scrum Master should use AI tools when coaching teams?
⬜ Let AI fully automate retrospectives and conflict resolution without team involvement
✅ Use AI to augment tasks like summarizing flow data, surfacing patterns, or drafting retrospective prompts, while keeping human judgment and empathy central to coaching decisions
⬜ Avoid AI entirely, since SAFe coaching must remain fully manual
⬜ Use AI only to generate PI Planning slide decks
Explanation:-
“Empowering teams with AI” in the updated ASM curriculum is about augmenting the Scrum Master’s judgment with data and automation, not replacing human coaching and facilitation.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
What is a key responsibility of an Advanced Scrum Master that goes beyond the SSM role?
⬜ Owning the Team Backlog
✅ Coaching other Scrum Masters and helping coordinate Scrum of Scrums across the ART
⬜ Approving the Program Increment objectives on behalf of Business Owners
⬜ Writing the ART’s Vision document
Explanation:-
ASMs often mentor newer Scrum Masters and participate in or facilitate ART-level coordination events such as Scrum of Scrums.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Which statement best reflects the difference between “managing” and “leading” a team, as emphasized in the ASM role?
✅ Leading focuses on inspiring shared purpose and growing capability, while managing focuses on directing tasks and controlling output
⬜ Leading and managing are identical in SAFe
⬜ Managing means only assigning story points
⬜ Leading applies only to Release Train Engineers, not Scrum Masters
Explanation:-
SAFe’s Lean-Agile leadership principles emphasize leading by example and growing people’s capabilities over command-and-control management.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A new Scrum Master on the ART frequently asks the ASM to resolve their team’s technical disagreements. What should the ASM do?
⬜ Resolve the disagreement directly since the ASM has more experience
✅ Coach the new Scrum Master on facilitation and conflict-resolution techniques so they can handle it themselves
⬜ Ask the Release Train Engineer to step in
⬜ Ignore the request since it isn’t the ASM’s job
Explanation:-
Part of evolving the ASM role is growing the capability of other Scrum Masters, not solving every problem for them.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Why is continuously growing agile maturity across the organization considered part of the Advanced Scrum Master’s role?
⬜ It is not part of the ASM role; that belongs to the Lean-Agile Center of Excellence only
✅ Because sustainable flow and high performance require the whole organization, not just one team, to keep improving its Lean-Agile practices
⬜ Because the ASM is evaluated only on the number of certifications their teammates hold
⬜ Because it replaces the need for retrospectives
Explanation:-
ASMs act as change agents who help spread Lean-Agile practices and continuous improvement beyond their immediate team.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Domain 2: Improving Flow
Which flow metric answers the question “How fast is value being delivered?”
✅ Flow Velocity
⬜ Flow Load
⬜ Flow Distribution
⬜ Flow Predictability
Explanation:-
Flow Velocity measures the number of work items a team, ART, or Value Stream completes over a given period of time.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
Which flow metric measures the elapsed time from when work enters the value stream until it is delivered to the customer?
⬜ Flow Efficiency
✅ Flow Time
⬜ Flow Load
⬜ Flow Distribution
Explanation:-
Flow Time is a customer-centric metric used to answer “are we reducing time to market?”.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
A team notices their Flow Efficiency is low even though team members appear busy. What does this most likely indicate?
⬜ The team has too few work items in progress
✅ Work items spend a large proportion of time waiting (e.g., for reviews or approvals) rather than being actively worked on
⬜ The team’s Flow Velocity is too high
⬜ The Program Increment is too short
Explanation:-
Flow Efficiency is the ratio of active time to total flow time; low efficiency usually points to queues and hand-off delays, not lack of team effort.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
Which flow metric helps a team understand whether the amount of work-in-progress matches its capacity?
⬜ Flow Time
✅ Flow Load
⬜ Flow Distribution
⬜ Flow Velocity
Explanation:-
Flow Load tracks all active work items to reveal whether demand and capacity are in balance; too much load causes queues and context switching.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
Which flow metric would a Product Owner use to check whether the team is investing appropriately in new features versus defects, technical debt, and risk reduction?
⬜ Flow Time
⬜ Flow Velocity
✅ Flow Distribution
⬜ Flow Predictability
Explanation:-
Flow Distribution shows the proportion of effort allocated across different flow item types (features, defects, debt, risk).
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
Which flow metric is most useful for assessing how reliably a Team, ART, or Solution Train delivers against its planned business value at PI boundaries?
⬜ Flow Load
⬜ Flow Efficiency
✅ Flow Predictability
⬜ Flow Time
Explanation:-
Flow Predictability compares actual delivered business value to planned business value, and feeds directly into the ART Predictability Measure calculated at Inspect and Adapt.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
Which of the eight flow accelerators is being applied when a team puts an explicit limit on the number of stories that can be “In Progress” on its Kanban board?
✅ Visualize and Limit WIP
⬜ Reduce Queue Length
⬜ Work in Smaller Batches
⬜ Address Bottlenecks
Explanation:-
Visualizing work and setting WIP limits improves transparency and reduces the cost of excessive multitasking.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
A team uses value stream mapping and a cumulative flow diagram to find where work is piling up in their process. Which flow accelerator does this represent?
⬜ Get Faster Feedback
✅ Address Bottlenecks
⬜ Optimize Time in the Zone
⬜ Remediate Legacy Policies and Practices
Explanation:-
Value stream mapping and cumulative flow diagrams are core tools for identifying constraints so they can be addressed directly.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
Which flow accelerator specifically targets delays caused by passing work between different teams or specialized roles?
⬜ Work in Smaller Batches
✅ Minimize Handoffs and Dependencies
⬜ Reduce Queue Length
⬜ Get Faster Feedback
Explanation:-
Cross-functional teams and loosely coupled architecture reduce the number of handoffs, which is a major source of delay and rework.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
A team implements continuous integration and automated testing so defects surface within minutes instead of weeks. Which flow accelerator is this an example of?
⬜ Visualize and Limit WIP
⬜ Work in Smaller Batches
✅ Get Faster Feedback
⬜ Address Bottlenecks
Explanation:-
Faster feedback loops, enabled by CI/CD and test automation, let teams catch and resolve issues far earlier.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
Why does breaking work into smaller batches generally accelerate flow?
✅ Smaller batches reduce variability and lead time, and let value be delivered and validated more frequently
⬜ Smaller batches always require more people
⬜ Smaller batches eliminate the need for a Definition of Done
⬜ Smaller batches remove the need for a Sprint/Iteration Review
Explanation:-
Reducing batch size is a core Lean principle that shortens feedback loops and reduces the risk of large, infrequent releases.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
An ART notices long queues of work waiting between the “Ready” and “In Progress” columns of its ART Kanban. Which flow accelerator most directly addresses this?
⬜ Get Faster Feedback
⬜ Optimize Time in the Zone
✅ Reduce Queue Length
⬜ Minimize Handoffs and Dependencies
Explanation:-
Managing and actively reducing queue length across a Kanban system minimizes wait time, which is often the biggest contributor to long flow times.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
A developer is frequently interrupted by chat messages and unplanned meetings during focused coding work. Which flow accelerator addresses this problem?
⬜ Address Bottlenecks
✅ Optimize Time in the Zone
⬜ Work in Smaller Batches
⬜ Remediate Legacy Policies and Practices
Explanation:-
Optimizing “time in the zone” means protecting focused work time and minimizing costly context switching.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
An organization requires a lengthy, multi-department change-approval process for even small production fixes, which slows every team on the ART. Which flow accelerator applies here?
⬜ Minimize Handoffs and Dependencies
⬜ Reduce Queue Length
✅ Remediate Legacy Policies and Practices
⬜ Visualize and Limit WIP
Explanation:-
Outdated organizational policies and practices that no longer fit an Agile way of working need to be identified and updated to unblock flow.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/accelerating-flow-with-safe
Domain 3: Building High-Performing Teams
Which of the following best characterizes a high-performing Agile team?
⬜ A team that never has disagreements
✅ A team with high trust, shared ownership, and a relentless focus on delivering value together
⬜ A team led entirely by a single technical expert
⬜ A team that strictly follows a fixed process without adapting it
Explanation:-
High-performing teams combine trust, transparency, cross-functional collaboration, and continuous improvement rather than rigid process adherence.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/team-and-technical-agility
What does it mean for a SAFe team to be “self-organizing”?
⬜ The team has no Scrum Master or Product Owner
✅ The team decides how best to accomplish the work assigned to it
⬜ The team sets its own compensation
⬜ The team reports only to executive leadership
Explanation:-
Self-organizing teams determine the best approach to achieve outcomes, working within organizational guardrails rather than being told exactly how to work.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/team-and-technical-agility
SAFe increasingly emphasizes teams being “self-managing” in addition to self-organizing. What does self-managing add?
⬜ The team no longer needs a Product Owner
✅ The team also has authority over some aspects of what work to do and when, not just how, within given guardrails
⬜ The team sets Portfolio-level strategic themes
⬜ The team manages its own budget without any Lean Portfolio Management oversight
Explanation:-
Self-managing teams extend self-organization by also having more say in prioritization and sequencing decisions within their guardrails.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/team-and-technical-agility
An Advanced Scrum Master observes a newly-formed team being polite but avoiding any disagreement in meetings. Using Tuckman’s model, which stage is this team most likely in?
✅ Forming
⬜ Storming
⬜ Norming
⬜ Performing
Explanation:-
In the Forming stage, members are often cautious and avoid conflict as they get to know each other and the work.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A team starts openly disagreeing about ways of working and roles shortly after formation, with visible friction between members. Which Tuckman stage is this?
⬜ Forming
✅ Storming
⬜ Norming
⬜ Performing
Explanation:-
Storming is characterized by conflict as team members assert viewpoints and work out roles and norms; it is a normal, necessary stage rather than a failure.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
According to Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions of a Team model, which dysfunction forms the foundation that all other dysfunctions build on?
✅ Absence of Trust
⬜ Fear of Conflict
⬜ Lack of Commitment
⬜ Avoidance of Accountability
Explanation:-
Trust is the base of the pyramid; without vulnerability-based trust, teams tend to avoid healthy conflict and everything above it suffers.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A team avoids any candid debate during planning because members are afraid of damaging relationships. Which of the Five Dysfunctions does this describe?
⬜ Absence of Trust
✅ Fear of Conflict
⬜ Inattention to Results
⬜ Avoidance of Accountability
Explanation:-
Fear of Conflict leads to artificial harmony, where teams avoid the productive, task-based debate needed to reach the best decisions.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Team members verbally agree to a PI Objective in a meeting but show little follow-through afterward. Which dysfunction is most likely at play?
⬜ Fear of Conflict
✅ Lack of Commitment
⬜ Absence of Trust
⬜ Inattention to Results
Explanation:-
Lack of Commitment often follows unresolved conflict — without a real debate, agreement is shallow and buy-in is weak, so follow-through suffers.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Team members consistently let a peer miss deadlines without saying anything, even though it affects the whole team’s delivery. Which dysfunction does this reflect?
⬜ Lack of Commitment
✅ Avoidance of Accountability
⬜ Inattention to Results
⬜ Fear of Conflict
Explanation:-
Avoidance of Accountability occurs when team members are reluctant to call out peers on behaviors or performance that hurt the team.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A team celebrates individual output even when the overall Program Increment objectives were missed. Which dysfunction is this an example of?
⬜ Avoidance of Accountability
⬜ Lack of Commitment
✅ Inattention to Results
⬜ Absence of Trust
Explanation:-
Inattention to Results happens when individual or departmental goals are prioritized over the collective results the team is meant to deliver.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Why is psychological safety important to building a high-performing team?
✅ It allows team members to take risks, admit mistakes, and raise concerns without fear of punishment or embarrassment
⬜ It guarantees the team will never miss a PI Objective
⬜ It removes the need for retrospectives
⬜ It means the ASM should never give critical feedback
Explanation:-
Psychological safety underlies healthy conflict, honest retrospectives, and continuous improvement — team members must feel safe to speak up.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
What is a “powerful question” in the context of Advanced Scrum Master coaching?
⬜ A question with only one correct answer
✅ An open-ended question that prompts the team to reflect and discover their own solution rather than being told the answer
⬜ A question the ASM asks only during hiring interviews
⬜ A closed yes/no question used to speed up meetings
Explanation:-
Powerful questions are a coaching technique that builds the team’s own problem-solving capability instead of the Scrum Master supplying answers.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Which behavior best demonstrates servant leadership by an Advanced Scrum Master?
✅ Removing organizational impediments so the team can focus on delivering value
⬜ Assigning story points on behalf of the team
⬜ Deciding the Sprint/Iteration Backlog unilaterally
⬜ Approving all code before it merges
Explanation:-
Servant leadership means prioritizing the team’s needs and growth, especially by clearing impediments that are beyond the team’s own authority to resolve.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Two teams on the same ART regularly duplicate effort because they don’t know what the other is building. What is the best mechanism to improve this cross-team collaboration?
⬜ Assign both teams the same Product Owner
✅ Regular cross-team syncs such as Scrum of Scrums and PO Sync
⬜ Merge the two teams’ backlogs into one without discussion
⬜ Escalate every overlap to the Business Owners
Explanation:-
Scrum of Scrums and PO Sync exist specifically to coordinate dependencies and avoid duplicated or conflicting work across teams on an ART.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/team-and-technical-agility
Why does SAFe encourage developing “T-shaped” skills within a team?
⬜ To ensure every member becomes a generalist with no deep expertise
✅ To reduce single points of failure and bottlenecks by having members with deep expertise in one area and working knowledge across others
⬜ To reduce the number of roles needed on an ART
⬜ To replace the need for a Scrum Master
Explanation:-
T-shaped skills (deep in one area, broad across others) improve flow by reducing dependency on any single specialist and enabling more flexible work assignment.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/team-and-technical-agility
What is a practical way for an Advanced Scrum Master to assess a team’s health and performance over time?
⬜ Rely solely on velocity numbers
✅ Use a combination of qualitative team self-assessments and quantitative flow/quality metrics
⬜ Ask the Release Train Engineer to rate the team
⬜ Compare the team’s story points directly against other teams
Explanation:-
A holistic view — combining team self-assessment (e.g., team health radars) with objective flow and quality data — gives a more accurate picture than any single metric.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
An Advanced Scrum Master wants to build trust with a skeptical stakeholder who was burned by missed commitments in the past. What is the most effective first step?
✅ Deliver consistently on smaller, transparent commitments and communicate progress openly
⬜ Promise an ambitious delivery date to win the stakeholder over immediately
⬜ Avoid the stakeholder until the team’s metrics improve
⬜ Ask a more senior leader to reassure the stakeholder instead
Explanation:-
Trust with stakeholders is rebuilt through consistent, transparent delivery over time — not promises.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Domain 4: Addressing Conflict
Which statement best reflects how SAFe views conflict within a team?
⬜ All conflict is destructive and should be eliminated
✅ Task-focused conflict is natural and can be productive, while unmanaged relationship conflict is destructive
⬜ Conflict should always be escalated to the Release Train Engineer
⬜ Conflict only occurs when a team lacks a Scrum Master
Explanation:-
SAFe recognizes that healthy, task-based conflict (debating ideas) improves decisions, whereas personal, relationship-based conflict damages trust and performance.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A disagreement over which architectural approach to use is an example of what type of conflict?
✅ Task or process conflict
⬜ Relationship conflict
⬜ Value conflict only
⬜ There is no such thing as task conflict in Agile teams
Explanation:-
Task/process conflict concerns the work itself — approach, priorities, or method — and, when handled well, often leads to better outcomes.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Using the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode framework, which style involves pursuing one’s own position at the expense of the other party, often used in a crisis needing quick, decisive action?
✅ Competing
⬜ Collaborating
⬜ Accommodating
⬜ Avoiding
Explanation:-
Competing is high on assertiveness and low on cooperativeness — useful for urgent decisions, but overused it damages relationships.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
Which Thomas-Kilmann conflict style seeks a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of all parties involved, and is generally best suited to complex issues where the relationship matters?
⬜ Compromising
✅ Collaborating
⬜ Accommodating
⬜ Avoiding
Explanation:-
Collaborating is high on both assertiveness and cooperativeness, aiming for a true win-win, though it takes more time and effort than other styles.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A Scrum Master and Product Owner each give up part of their preferred approach to quickly reach a workable middle-ground decision before a deadline. Which conflict style does this represent?
⬜ Competing
⬜ Collaborating
✅ Compromising
⬜ Avoiding
Explanation:-
Compromising trades some of each party’s goals for a faster, moderately satisfying resolution — useful under time pressure but not always optimal long-term.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A team member consistently withdraws from a disagreement and changes the subject rather than addressing it. Which Thomas-Kilmann style is this person exhibiting?
⬜ Accommodating
✅ Avoiding
⬜ Compromising
⬜ Competing
Explanation:-
Avoiding is low on both assertiveness and cooperativeness; it can be appropriate for trivial issues but is harmful if used for important, recurring conflicts.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A developer repeatedly gives in to a more vocal teammate’s preferences on design decisions to keep the peace, even when they disagree. Which Thomas-Kilmann style does this represent?
✅ Accommodating
⬜ Competing
⬜ Collaborating
⬜ Avoiding
Explanation:-
Accommodating is low on assertiveness and high on cooperativeness — sometimes appropriate to preserve harmony, but overused it can suppress valuable dissent.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
What does “interest-based” (as opposed to “positional”) conflict resolution focus on?
⬜ Determining who has the higher position in the org chart
✅ Understanding the underlying needs and motivations behind each party’s stated position, to find a solution that addresses both
⬜ Always finding a 50/50 compromise regardless of underlying needs
⬜ Letting the most senior person decide
Explanation:-
Interest-based problem-solving looks past the stated positions to the real interests behind them, often revealing solutions positional bargaining would miss.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
What is generally the most appropriate role for an Advanced Scrum Master when conflict arises between two team members?
⬜ Decide who is right and instruct the other to comply
✅ Facilitate a constructive conversation so the team members work through the conflict themselves
⬜ Report the conflict to HR immediately in all cases
⬜ Ignore it since it will resolve itself
Explanation:-
The ASM acts as a facilitator and coach who helps parties communicate and resolve issues, rather than acting as a judge or decision-maker.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A disagreement between two teams on an ART about a shared dependency cannot be resolved despite repeated attempts at the team level. What should the Advanced Scrum Master do?
⬜ Let the disagreement continue since ASMs shouldn’t get involved in cross-team issues
✅ Escalate and facilitate resolution at the ART level, involving the Release Train Engineer if needed
⬜ Instruct one team to unilaterally give in
⬜ Wait until the next Program Increment to address it
Explanation:-
When conflict can’t be resolved at the team level, it should be escalated and facilitated at the appropriate level — often with RTE involvement — rather than left unresolved.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
A team has the same disagreement resurface in every retrospective without real resolution. What technique should the Advanced Scrum Master introduce to address the recurring pattern?
⬜ Skip retrospectives until the conflict fades
✅ Use root-cause analysis techniques, such as the 5 Whys, to identify and address the underlying cause rather than the symptoms
⬜ Rotate team members every Sprint to avoid the friction
⬜ Simply document the conflict without further action
Explanation:-
Recurring conflict is often a symptom of a deeper root cause; techniques like the 5 Whys help the team get past symptoms to the actual issue.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
Domain 5: Improving ART Performance
What are the three main parts of the SAFe Inspect and Adapt (I&A) event?
✅ PI System Demo, Quantitative and Qualitative Measurement, and the Problem-Solving Workshop
⬜ Sprint Planning, Daily Stand-up, and Sprint Review
⬜ PI Planning, Backlog Refinement, and Retrospective
⬜ Vision, Roadmap, and Backlog
Explanation:-
The I&A event structures ART-level inspection and improvement into these three distinct parts at the end of every Program Increment.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
What is the primary purpose of the PI System Demo within the Inspect and Adapt event?
⬜ To plan the next Program Increment’s objectives
✅ To demonstrate the integrated, working system increment to stakeholders and gather their feedback
⬜ To calculate individual team member performance ratings
⬜ To resolve conflicts between teams
Explanation:-
The PI System Demo shows the full, integrated solution built across the ART during the PI so stakeholders can see real progress and give feedback.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
How is the ART Predictability Measure typically calculated?
⬜ By counting the number of stories completed regardless of value
✅ By aggregating each team’s actual versus planned business value achieved for their PI Objectives
⬜ By averaging individual developer story points
⬜ By counting the number of retrospectives held
Explanation:-
The ART Predictability Measure reflects how well the ART, in aggregate, delivered against the planned business value of its PI Objectives — reliable ARTs typically score 80-100%.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
Besides the ART Predictability Measure, what other type of data is examined during the Quantitative and Qualitative Measurement part of I&A?
⬜ Only the ART’s total budget spent
✅ Qualitative data such as customer satisfaction (e.g., NPS), defect/quality trends, and team/employee engagement feedback
⬜ Individual salary and compensation data
⬜ Only competitor product pricing
Explanation:-
Qualitative measures complement the quantitative predictability score, giving a fuller picture of ART health beyond just “did we hit the plan.”
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
Which root-cause analysis technique, commonly used in the I&A Problem-Solving Workshop, involves repeatedly asking “why” to trace a problem back to its underlying cause?
⬜ Value stream mapping
✅ The 5 Whys
⬜ Planning poker
⬜ A cumulative flow diagram
Explanation:-
The 5 Whys is a simple, iterative technique for drilling past symptoms to find the true root cause of a systemic problem.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
What visual technique is commonly used alongside the 5 Whys in the Problem-Solving Workshop to organize potential causes of a problem into categories?
⬜ A Kanban board
✅ A fishbone (Ishikawa) diagram
⬜ A burn-down chart
⬜ A program board
Explanation:-
The fishbone/Ishikawa diagram groups potential causes (e.g., people, process, tools, environment) to help teams systematically explore what’s driving a problem.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
After the Problem-Solving Workshop identifies root causes and improvement actions, where do those improvement items typically go?
⬜ They are discarded once the workshop ends
✅ They become backlog items considered for the next Program Increment
⬜ They are only tracked informally by the Scrum Master
⬜ They must be implemented within the same day
Explanation:-
Improvement backlog items from I&A are added to the relevant Team or Program Backlog so they can be prioritized and planned into upcoming iterations.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
What is the main purpose of the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration within a Program Increment?
⬜ To add an extra Iteration of committed feature work
✅ To provide dedicated time for innovation, exploration, PI Planning preparation, and events like Inspect and Adapt, without the pressure of iteration velocity
⬜ To replace the need for a System Demo
⬜ To extend the deadline for unfinished committed stories
Explanation:-
The IP Iteration is intentionally kept outside of normal velocity/commitment tracking to give teams space for innovation, education, and ART-level events like I&A.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/innovation-and-planning-iteration
What does it mean for ART events to be “outcome-based” rather than purely ceremonial?
✅ Events are run to produce meaningful decisions and improvements, not just to check a box that the ceremony happened
⬜ Events no longer need a fixed agenda
⬜ Events are optional for the Release Train Engineer
⬜ Events should be canceled if attendance is low
Explanation:-
An outcome-based approach means each ART event (PI Planning, System Demo, I&A, etc.) is judged by the value and decisions it produces, not merely by having occurred on schedule.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/inspect-and-adapt
How can an Advanced Scrum Master best support the Release Train Engineer in improving ART performance?
⬜ By taking over the RTE’s responsibilities during I&A
✅ By helping facilitate Scrum of Scrums, coaching individual Scrum Masters, and surfacing team-level flow data that feeds into ART-level decisions
⬜ By avoiding involvement in ART-level events entirely
⬜ By only focusing on their own team and ignoring ART-wide concerns
Explanation:-
ASMs support the RTE by extending coaching and facilitation to the ART level, helping connect team-level issues to systemic, ART-wide improvements.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/scrum-master-team-coach
An ART’s flow metrics show consistently high Flow Load and low Flow Predictability across multiple teams. What should this signal to the Advanced Scrum Master and RTE?
⬜ Nothing; these metrics are unrelated to ART performance
✅ A likely systemic capacity/demand imbalance across the ART that should be investigated and addressed, potentially in the Problem-Solving Workshop
⬜ That the ART should immediately add more Program Increments per year
⬜ That the next System Demo should be canceled
Explanation:-
When flow metrics point to problems across multiple teams, it suggests a systemic, ART-level issue best surfaced and addressed through Inspect and Adapt rather than treated as one team’s problem.
Source: https://framework.scaledagile.com/art-flow
